LOVEJILI PG Soft Slots — The Titles Here and the RTP Each Prints
This part of the site has 4 pages devoted to pg soft slots.
- LOVEJILI Fortune Ox
- With 10 paylines and a 3-4-3 grid of irregular shape, Fortune Ox is a PG Soft slot.
- LOVEJILI Mahjong Ways
- Mahjong Ways comes from PG Soft: a 5x4 slot where wins are assessed across 1,024 ways.
- LOVEJILI Treasures of Aztec
- The PG Soft slot Treasures of Aztec is built on a 6x5 grid, with wins evaluated across up to 32,400 ways.
- LOVEJILI Wild Bandito
- A 5x4 grid and 1,024 ways to win define Wild Bandito, a slot made by PG Soft.
PG Soft publishes return-to-player for each title covered here, and it also appears to ship a game in a single fixed configuration, whereas Pragmatic ships three. The number exists, but only in the data that builds the page; on the game pages themselves the field renders as a blank dash. There are 4 pages below.
Everything in this section
| Title | Published RTP | Max win | Ways to win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortune Ox | 96.75% | 2000x | 10 |
| Wild Bandito | 96.73% | 25000x | 1,024 ways to win |
| Treasures of Aztec | 96.71% | Not published | up to 32,400 ways to win |
| Mahjong Ways | 96.92% | 25000x | 1,024 ways to win |
4 separate pages, each given over to one entry, not to a summary of a group. Any field marked “not published” above is explained on the entry’s own page, including who would have to publish it.
Each entry in a paragraph
You get a brief summary of each, enough to see which page to go to.
The Fortune Ox entry
Launched in 2021, the game is a 3-reel slot with a 3-4-3 row layout across 3 reels and 10 paylines. Built around a 3-4-3 arrangement with a taller middle reel, one row above the outer two.
It lists a published RTP of 96.75%, tops out at a 2000x maximum win, and is described as medium in volatility.
Wild Bandito explained
Ways-to-win slot, 5-reel, laid out on 5 reels and 4 rows, with 1,024 ways to win, released in 2022. Built around multipliers that hold for the length of the free-spins round and skip any reset between spins.
Publishes an RTP of 96.73% and a maximum win of 25000x, and describes the volatility as high
Treasures of Aztec, in detail
The game is a 6-reel ways-to-win slot using 6 reels and 5 rows, which gives up to 32,400 ways to win; it was released in 2020. Built around free spins push a multiplier up at double the pace it moves at otherwise.
A published RTP of 96.71%, medium volatility as described, and no quoted maximum win here.
Mahjong Ways in full
The 5-reel ways-to-win layout is 5 reels by 4 rows, giving 1,024 ways to win; it came out in 2019. Built around a multiplier that grows with each cascade in free spins and stays put instead of falling back during the round.
Published details: RTP 96.92%, a 25000x maximum win and medium volatility as the description.
The thing most often got wrong here
The right phrase for any figure on these pages is “per PG Soft’s published game data” rather than “as shown on PG Soft’s page”. Where the RTP is expected, the official page has a dash, and a reader checking will see it.
The data holds up as real, since every figure matched independent consensus for the same title, strong evidence it is current and not stale. A reader can disprove in a single click the idea that PG Soft’s page shows the number, and a site caught that way does worse than one that never quoted it.
Take the pg soft slots details from the game itself
With PG Soft, the visible page leaves the figure out, so checking it takes one more step than it does with Pragmatic:
- The studio’s own page for the title lives on pgsoft.com, so start there. RTP fields render as a dash, and this is expected; hence the phrase “published game data” instead of “shown on the page” on these pages.
- Hold the figure here up against two independent aggregators for comparison. Both agreeing was this site’s standard for confirming that the underlying data is real and current.
- Put the grid shape next to the way-count and see if they match. A number of these titles have irregular grids, among them Fortune Ox at 3-4-3 and Wild Bounty Showdown at 3-4-5-5-4-3, and for those a simple “reels by rows” wording does not match the paytable.
- Put Treasures of Aztec’s maximum win down as unsettled, whatever number is quoted. PG Soft’s own data states a maximum exposure of 100,000x and independent simulation estimates a practical maximum near 9,071x, though they may not measure the same thing.
Playing pg soft slots at LOVEJILI
- Log in to LOVEJILI, then open the slot lobby.
- Run a search for the name of a title in the table above, or apply the lobby’s studio filter.
- Cross-check this page’s figures with the paytable and stake range found in the game’s info screen.
- Choose how much to spend this session, then play low stakes at first while the feature round is new to you.
FAQ
Is RTP published by PG Soft on its own website?
A blank dash fills the visible field, even though the figure is published in the data the server sends with every game page. The studio provides this number even though it is not on screen.
Do PG Soft games have a range of RTP configurations, much like Pragmatic's?
No title here came with evidence of that. Quoting a PG Soft RTP is more directly meaningful than quoting a Pragmatic one, as each game seems to arrive with only one fixed figure.
Are these titles available at LOVEJILI?
Look in the Slots tab of the LOVEJILI lobby for the title you are after. Our descriptions of each game copy what the studio publishes, which means the figures are good wherever the game is played.
What distinguishes Mahjong Ways from its follow-up, Mahjong Ways 2?
Where there were 1,024 ways there are now 2,000, close to double, the cascade is now an avalanche, and the published maximum steps up from 25,000x to 100,000x. RTP: 96.92% versus 96.95%, a barely noticeable move, so the extra headroom is paid for in how seldom it is reached.
Why doesn't Treasures of Aztec display a maximum win?
Owing to PG Soft's own data field giving 100,000x, set against a practical maximum near 9,071x from independent simulation of the game's mathematics. What one calls a certified ceiling and the other a modelled outcome may not be the same measurement, and picking either would misrepresent the other.
If a medium-volatility game has a 100,000x maximum win, what does that actually say?
Usually that the maximum is better understood as a ceiling for accounting than as a realistic outcome. The two things measure different events: medium volatility covers clustered results and a 100,000x ceiling covers one far outside them. Being true together is possible for both, with the label proving the more useful.